Skip to main content

Painful reforms for building a super power India


Painful reforms for building a super power India


Mr. Modi needs to initiate three important reforms: governance reforms, reforms for massive infrastructure investments, and reforms in government spending in the immediate run for making India a super power. First, administrative reforms have been long overdue. A young and new India cannot be governed by age-old pre-independence era mindsets and archaic rules. Mr. Modi’s mantra of minimum government and maximum governance has to be implemented with full vigor in all earnest. Present day youth believe in action not in mere dreams. Job creation can happen through privatization and moving out the government from many of uncalled for areas of activity. Second, reforms in the infrastructure can bring in more and more jobs. Rationalization of rules in the real estate sector in cooperation with the state governments has a great potential for job creation. Further, government spending should dive into creating large time bound infra projects like the Ganga-Kaveri link canal project that has the potential to irrigate huge areas in several states. Industrial corridors such as Mumbai-Bangalore, Delhi-Mumbai, Chennai-Bangalore, Kolkata-Patna could lead to overcome jobless growth by giving a big push for manufacturing sector.
Third, government spending needs a thorough relook. This is where Mr. Modi would face a lot of criticism. Indeed very painful it is for a political leader. Our age-old philosophy of subsidies is on a wrong footing influenced by Nehruvian idea that poor need support. Unfortunately, this leads to view point that poor should always be under the aegis of the government or someone else – which is completely wrong. Poor of India want jobs, not alms. They are not beggars. In the name of social spending, much of our financial resources have gone into the drain. As in the words of the late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, only 17 paisa in a rupee could reach the poor. In such a scenario, why should a country pursue such wasteful programs? What the poor in India need is a job with respect. If the poor get jobs, they know very well how to spend their money and where to spend. The government need not worry about such micro issues. Ideally, the government should look at macro issues that can aid efficient micro management. Doing away with subsidies and creating ease of access for all without discrimination would herald a new era of building a unifying society, which indeed would be great cohesive force for a mighty India in the near future.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Quick Take on the RBI Monetary Policy Announcement

  My Quick Take on the RBI Monetary Policy Announcement Overall, I believe the RBI's decision to maintain the repo rate at 6.5% and raise the GDP growth forecast for FY23-24 to 7% is a positive and prudent move. Here are my perspectives on the key aspects:   1. Pause in the rate hike cycle: Anticipate a protracted pause in the short-term key lending rate due to the increasing GDP growth and controllable inflation. This will provide much-needed relief to businesses and individuals struggling with high borrowing costs.   2. Stable economic growth: India's GDP growth of 7.6% in Q2 FY23-24 demonstrates a resilient and vigorous economic revival. The RBI's updated projection of a 7% expansion for the whole fiscal year further reinforces this optimistic perspective.   3. Inflation remains a concern: While the recent decline in inflation to a four-month low is encouraging, continued vigilance is necessary. The RBI's focus on withdrawal of accommodation w...

The Dynamics of Finance-Growth Nexus in Advanced Economies

This study investigates the relationship between finance and economic growth in advanced economies as these countries experience significantly higher levels of financial development. Using a fully balanced panel of 31 years from 1983 to 2013 for 24 economies, we provide new evidence on the finance-growth relationship. We evidence the presence of nonlinearity as there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between finance and growth in the long run. The results show that there exists a threshold effect of the finance-growth relationship estimated at 142 percent of GDP. We find that surpassing the threshold would cost the countries instead of furthering economic growth as too much finance is harmful. Based on the panel Granger causality test results, we argue that financial development should be associated with optimal growth performance. Our findings for the advanced economies provide useful inferences to the emerging and developing economies in designing their financial dev...

Monetary and Fiscal Policy Coordination during the Fiscal Dominance Regimes

Key points • This study empirically examines the interaction between monetary and fiscal policy by using Vector Auto Regressions (VAR) and a Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) and explores the need for coordination. • The Stackelberg interaction model with government leadership to know the strategic interaction between monetary and fiscal policy is analyzed. • The findings show that an unexpected increase in the monetary policy effect: (i) has a contractionary impact on the economic growth; (ii) leads to a gradual decline in the inflation; (iii) tightens the liquidity conditions; and (iv) rise in the bond yields. On the other hand, an unexpected increase in the fiscal policy effect: (i) has a positive effect on GDP growth; (ii) has an initial decline, but a gradual rise in the inflation levels; and (iii) leads to falling bond yields. • Monetary policy is found to be more responsive to fiscal policy effects. The results imply that there is a greater need for effective coordinat...