Decomposing
the Dynamics of Intra-Regional Investments in South Asia
by
Dr. Vighneswara Swamy
The potential for faster growth in South Asia,
through greater intra – regional investment flows is substantial. South Asia
has many unexploited opportunities for embodied knowledge transfer and
supply-chain linkages. Liberalizing policy constraints in both trade and investment,
and improving the enabling business conditions through minimum government and
maximum governance with transparency could help to substantially improve the
regional economic cooperation and integration in South Asia. Nevertheless, compared
to other regions, why South Asia has very little intra-regional cross-border
investments? While ASEAN in the neighborhood is growing at significant pace
with considerable intra-regional investments, what ails the South Asia in this
regard? Why has South Asia failed to recognize the potential gains from
intra-regional investments? Which are the barriers that hinder these investment
flows in the region? Why South Asia is unique?
South Asia, home to a population of 1.671 billion
with human density of 400 persons per square kilometer, accounts for almost
23.45 % of the world’s population, but only 3.1% of the world’s GDP. Though
South Asia has experienced a long period of robust economic growth, averaging
6% a year over the past 20 years, yet poverty remains widespread with the
world’s largest concentration of poor — more than 500 million who live on less
than $1.25 a day. The explanation in part could be attributed to the inward
looking policies pursued by the South Asian governments, the overt dominance of
the state in almost all spheres of economic activity, and the singular lack of
emphasis on human and social development.
World Development
Indicators reveal that growth in South Asia weakened to an estimated 4.86% in
2012 (6.32% in 2011) from 7.4% in 2010, mainly as a result of a slowdown in
India, where GDP growth was forecast to be 5.4% in March 2013 (refer Table 1).Weak
global demand has exacerbated region-specific factors, including subdued
investment growth, electricity shortages, policy uncertainties, and a weak
monsoon. Regional GDP is projected to grow by 5.7% in the 2013 calendar year,
6.4% in 2014, and 6.7% in 2015, driven by improvement in export demand, policy
reforms in India, stronger investment activity, and normal agricultural
production.
Table 1: Growth
in South Asia
Country/Region
|
GDP
growth
|
|
2011
|
2012
|
|
Afghanistan
|
6.11
|
14.39
|
Bangladesh
|
6.71
|
6.23
|
Bhutan
|
8.51
|
9.44
|
India
|
6.64
|
4.74
|
Maldives
|
7.05
|
3.42
|
Nepal
|
3.42
|
4.85
|
Pakistan
|
2.79
|
4.02
|
Sri Lanka
|
8.25
|
6.41
|
South Asia
|
6.32
|
4.86
|
World
|
2.88
|
2.37
|
Source:
World Development Indicators May 2014
– World Bank Data
|
||
Growth in South Asia has been disappointing and
although vulnerabilities are declining, they remain. While further (disorderly) adjustment of long term interest rates remains
as a tail risk for macroeconomic stability and growth, the weight is shifting
towards domestic challenges.
Table 2: South Asia’s Macro Indicators
Region
|
Indicator
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011 SA/World
|
2012 SA/World
|
World
|
Exports
of goods and services (current US$ bn)
|
22509
|
22769
|
||
SA
|
Exports
of goods and services (current US$ bn)
|
524
|
520
|
2.33
|
2.29
|
World
|
GDP
per capita (current US$)
|
10224
|
10318
|
||
SA
|
GDP
per capita (current US$)
|
1416
|
1396
|
13.85
|
13.53
|
World
|
Imports
of goods and services (current US$ bn)
|
21889
|
22138
|
||
SA
|
Imports
of goods and services (current US$ bn)
|
684
|
694
|
3.12
|
3.13
|
World
|
Merchandise
exports (current US$ bn)
|
18415
|
18447
|
||
SA
|
Merchandise
exports (current US$ bn)
|
365
|
355
|
1.98
|
1.92
|
World
|
Merchandise
imports (current US$)
|
18490
|
18559
|
||
SA
|
Merchandise
imports (current US$ bn)
|
580
|
602
|
3.13
|
3.24
|
World
|
Merchandise
trade (% of GDP)
|
51.63
|
50.69
|
||
SA
|
Merchandise
trade (% of GDP)
|
40.98
|
41.54
|
||
World
|
Portfolio
equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$ bn)
|
268
|
776
|
||
SA
|
Portfolio
equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$ bn)
|
(4)
|
23
|
-1.60
|
3.01
|
World
|
Service
exports (BoP, current US$ bn)
|
4353
|
4438
|
||
SA
|
Service
exports (BoP, current US$ bn)
|
154
|
163
|
3.55
|
3.68
|
World
|
Service
imports (BoP, current US$)
|
4118
|
4222
|
||
SA
|
Service
imports (BoP, current US$)
|
146
|
153
|
3.55
|
3.62
|
World
|
Trade
(% of GDP)
|
61.19
|
60.56
|
||
SA
|
Trade
(% of GDP)
|
52.04
|
52.49
|
||
World
|
Trade
in services (% of GDP)
|
11.83
|
11.84
|
||
SA
|
Trade
in services (% of GDP)
|
13.04
|
13.73
|
According to the World Development
Indicators (May 2014), South Asia’s GDP per capita (US$ 1416) is a meager 13.85
percent of the world’s per capita GDP
(US$ 10224) in 2011 and indeed declined to (US$ 1396) 13.53 percent of the
world’s per capita GDP (US$ 10318) in 2012 (refer Table 2). Further, South
Asia’s share of export of goods and services in the world has decreased from
2.33 percent (US$ 524 bn) in 2011 to 2.29 percent (US$ 524 bn) in 2012. The
share of import of goods and services has slightly moved from 3.12 percent (US$
684 bn) in 2011 to 3.13 percent (US$ 694 bn) in 2012. Share of South Asia in
the world’s merchandise exports is a meager 1.98 percent (US$ 365 bn) in 2011,
which further declined to 1.92 percent (US$ 355 bn) in 2012. However, the share
in merchandise imports grew from 3.13 percent (US$ 580 bn) in 2011 to 3.24
percent (US$ 602 bn) in 2012. The share of service exports has moved from 3.55
percent (US$ 154 bn) in 2011 to 3.68 percent (US$ 163 bn) in 2012. On the
financial front, the equity portfolio flows, the share of South Asia is -1.6
percent (minus US$ 4 bn) in 2011, which in turn has turned positive to 3.01
percent (US$ 23 bn) in 2012.
Regional inflation in
South Asia remains the highest among developing regions, even though monetary
policy has been broadly tightened. Fiscal deficits and public debt in the
region remain large, thereby constraining the policy space. The average fiscal
deficit across South Asian countries was estimated to be 6.7 percent of GDP in
2013, down from 7.5 percent in 2012. The gross public debt as an average annual
percent of GDP particularly that of India and Pakistan has already crossed the
threshold levels and is a cause of concern (refer Table
3).
Table 3: Fiscal Indicators of South Asian Economies
Country
|
CPI
inflation rate
(Average
annual % growth)
|
Gross
public debt
(Average
annual % of GDP)
|
International
reserves
(Average
annual % of GDP)
|
||
2010–2012
|
2005–2007
|
2010–2012
|
2005–2007
|
2010–2012
|
|
Afghanistan
|
6.2
|
..
|
..
|
..
|
33.8
|
Bangladesh
|
9.7
|
..
|
..
|
6.2
|
9.9
|
India
|
9.1
|
78.4
|
67.2
|
19.2
|
16.1
|
Nepal
|
9.5
|
48.1
|
34.0
|
20.1
|
18.7
|
Pakistan
|
10.8
|
59.4
|
61.4
|
10.4
|
7.5
|
Sri Lanka
|
6.8
|
..
|
..
|
10.7
|
12.2
|
Source:
World Development Report 2014
Investment flows into
South Asia has not gained the requisite momentum in the last two years. FDI net
inflows as percent of GDP for the world were at the level of 2.50 percent in
2011 and 2.08 percent in 2012 (refer Table 4).
However, South Asia received net inflows at 1.75 percent to GDP in 2011 and at
1.19 percent in 2012. Maldives (11.91%; 12.78%) is the only country to perform
above average net inflows during 2011 and 2012. The major economy in the region
– India could experience 1.94 % in 2011 and 1.29% in 2012. Sri Lanka with1.51 %
in 2012 performed better than India though with a background of politically
destabilized past.
Table 4: FDI
Inflows into South Asia
Country
|
FDI
Flows
|
|
2011
|
2012
|
|
Afghanistan
|
0.51
|
0.46
|
Bangladesh
|
1.02
|
1.01
|
Bhutan
|
1.42
|
0.54
|
India
|
1.94
|
1.29
|
Maldives
|
11.91
|
12.78
|
Nepal
|
0.49
|
0.49
|
Pakistan
|
0.61
|
0.38
|
Sri Lanka
|
1.62
|
1.51
|
South Asia
|
1.75
|
1.19
|
World
|
2.50
|
2.08
|
Source: World
Development Indicators May 2014 –
World Bank Data
Note:
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP)
|
||
Despite the
establishment of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC)
in1985 to promote economic growth and development through active regional
collaboration and cooperation, and the SAARC Preferential Trading Arrangement
(SAPTA) and the South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) which took effect in 1995
and 2006, respectively, to accelerate trade and foster deeper integration and
regional cooperation, full liberalization and cooperation is yet to take off.
High levels of protectionism by the participating countries continue to
persist. South Asia yet suffers from prohibitive tariffs and high inter-state
barriers to trade. Interstate mobility is hampered by stringent visa rules.
Furthermore, the exclusion of services and investment from SAFTA renders the
agreement toothless in major areas as the intra-regional investment, as well as
trade, within the region remains meager.
The above-portrayed big
picture necessitates an increased attention and focused cooperation by the
South Asian governments to increase their economic cooperation and speedier
integration of South Asian economies for faster growth and economic prosperity.
The promotion of growth through increased trade and investment and deeper
regional economic integration, hold much promise towards further reductions in
poverty in the South Asian region. As the World is globalizing, South Asia too
is changing its perspective on globalization and is adopting a more outward
economic orientation. Though there is some resistance to South Asian regional
cooperation particularly because of the region’s long history of political
conflict and a somewhat unyielding protectionist stance, South Asia is warming
up to the policies of liberalization and openness and hence the reforms are
under way.
The political
environment in South Asia has taken a new look after the Indian Prime Minister
Mr. Modi’s invitation to SAARC heads of governments for his
swearing-in-ceremony following his decisive victory in May 2014. Mr. Modi has
put new life into SAARC and has conveyed the message that all SAARC nations
need to develop, survive, and prosper together. He followed his South Asia
initiative by making his first foreign visit to Bhutan. Further, after
witnessing the successful launch of the India’s Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV-C23),
Mr. Modi called upon the Indian space community to take up the challenge of
developing a SAARC satellite that can be dedicated to our neighborhood as a
gift from India. Mr. Modi’s government is mooting the idea of a SAARC bank in
the lines of BRICS bank to take forward its South Asia initiative. This renewed
vigor in South Asian cooperation needs to be exploited for the betterment of
millions of poor in the region.
Given this context, we
derive compelling motivation to undertake a comprehensive study to decompose
the dynamics of intra-regional investments in South Asia apart from showcasing
the benefits of regional cooperation and integration to present policy
recommendations to realize such gains. South Asia needs to go beyond its
history and look toward the immense potential of regional cooperation and
integration in the areas of trade & investment, employment, and
development. To make the study holistic, we propose to undertake country
investment studies to address the issues surrounding intra-regional foreign
direct investment in all the South Asian countries, duly address the specific
constraints, and assess the potential for intra-regional investments in each
country. There is also a need to present an informed latent viewpoint about
these flows by examining emerging trends and patterns of intra-regional investments in
South Asia. Though, there exists a
large strand of literature that investigate the cross-border investment flows, we
find very few studies that examine the intra-regional investments particularly
in South Asia. The researcher has a strong intuition to bring out a Theory of
Osmotic Movement of Intra-Regional Investments (TOMIRI) by providing empirical
evidence to the hypothesis.
Comments
Post a Comment